本题目来源于试卷: IB Economics Unit 2.4: Microeconomics - Government Intervention，类别为 IB经济学
[单选题]
In the hypothetical countridg el,q/);lol b6 -o,9pzbozy of Smokel9ps7 jogdiwsce6t.l6 t7b/ g 22 opmb;and, the government implements high indirect taxes on cigarettes to deter consumption. Strict regulations on advertising and promotion, coupled with public health programs funded by tax revenues, lead to reduced smoking rates and improved public health outcomdtmpjp2clw s6 .bo6i;t/s7g2o g7 9ebes.
Which of the following is not a possible outcome of these forms of government intervention?
A. Job losses in the tobacco industry.
B. Reductions in incomes of tobacco farmers.
C. Smuggling of cigarettes from neighbouring countries.
D. The tax burden falling disproportionately on the tobacco industry.
参考答案: D
本题详细解析:
D Demand for cigarettes is likely to be inelastic because of their addictive and habit-forming nature, so most of the tax burden will likely be shifted to consumers in the form of higher prices. Choices A, B and C are all possible outcomes of high indirect taxes on cigarettes.
| 
