题库网 (tiku.one)

 找回密码
 立即注册

手机扫一扫,访问本页面

开启左侧

IB Psychology HL Cognitive Approaches to Human Behaviour (id: 238cf2329)

[复制链接]
admin 发表于 2024-4-8 08:31:40 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
本题目来源于试卷: IB Psychology HL Cognitive Approaches to Human Behaviour,类别为 IB心理学

[单选题]
What was the central focus of Tvslq+71dwyv i2g:y* i q cc d:d1t6i6mtersky and Kahneman's (19f)xhmf g,x. (/lkxx ;q tlq-c474) research on cognitive biases and decisioq)/x4ltm-g, q; fk(xfc lx xh.n-making?

A. Developing the dual process model of thinking and decision-making
B. Understanding intuitive judgments in situations involving risks and uncertainty
C. Understanding the limits of working memory on people's ability to compute optimal decisions
D. Developing a model for behavioural economics.


参考答案:  B


本题详细解析:
Choice B is the accurate response because Tversky and Kahneman fs*9rdkf( bc h.. .hmenocused on the limits of rational thinking. Their investigation of intuitive judgments eventually led to identifying different cognitive biases explaining why people may not always make rational decisions. Tversky and Kahneman focused on something other than working memory, their findings' link. d.r9f(mh hn .bk*cses to behavioural economics were accidental, and the dual-process model of thinking and decision-making was initially credited to Stanovich and West (2000). Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974). Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases. Science, 185(4157), 1124-1131. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.185.4157.1124 Stanovich, K. E., & West, R. G. (2000). Individual differences in reasoning: Implications for the rationality debate? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 23(5), 645-665. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0140525x00003435

微信扫一扫,分享更方便

帖子地址: 

回复

使用道具 举报

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

本版积分规则

浏览记录|使用帮助|手机版|切到手机版|题库网 (https://tiku.one)

GMT+8, 2024-11-23 16:20 , Processed in 0.045764 second(s), 28 queries , Redis On.

搜索
快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表