题库网 (tiku.one)

 找回密码
 立即注册

手机扫一扫,访问本页面

开启左侧

IB Economics Unit 2.3: Microeconomics - Elasticities (id: 0b6b2a784)

[复制链接]
admin 发表于 2024-4-8 19:06:11 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
本题目来源于试卷: IB Economics Unit 2.3: Microeconomics - Elasticities,类别为 IB经济学

[单选题]
In the hypothetical country o+nj )s+uhqr:x:l6j ,:9 ceckdm 1 vilpf Smokeland, the government implements hi5b :hd y6g,yq42ipur ygh indirect taxes on cigarett4hq6py,b:u5yir 2d yg es to deter consumption. Strict regulations on advertising and promotion, coupled with public health programs funded by tax revenues, lead to reduced smoking rates and improved public health outcomes.
Which of the following is not a possible outcome of these forms of government intervention?

A. Job losses in the tobacco industry.
B. Reductions in incomes of tobacco farmers.
C. Smuggling of cigarettes from neighbouring countries.
D. The tax burden falling disproportionately on the tobacco industry.


参考答案:  D


本题详细解析:
Demand for cigarettes is likely to be injd)+6u1ktde so/ ;pv(k3r lmfelastic because of their addictive and habit-forming nature, so ml +ejurvkt)k;f 1o (3dmspd6/ost of the tax burden will likely be shifted to consumers in the form of higher prices. Choices A, B and C are all possible outcomes of high indirect taxes on cigarettes.

微信扫一扫,分享更方便

帖子地址: 

回复

使用道具 举报

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

本版积分规则

浏览记录|使用帮助|手机版|切到手机版|题库网 (https://tiku.one)

GMT+8, 2024-10-5 01:11 , Processed in 0.055714 second(s), 28 queries , Redis On.

搜索
快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表